The necessity of invention

Reading Time: 7 minutes

This blog post is being written in public. This block will be deleted when I decide it is ‘done’.

When I think about the common denominator between the people I admire most and would like to spend most time with in this world — it is how easy they bring things forth. The world I’d like to live in is one where the people I love continuously have the promise and perhaps the means to shape new spaces where I’d like to live, as I have promised them words myself. I’ve been thinking for two decades and it all must be very simple: I can choose to make a world for myself where navigating every alternative path is likely to be more arduous and lonely but enriching all the same — but I long to share in this life; it is so much more beautiful with the agency & abundance that is merely latent. What a gift it is to experience something and know that contentment is a decision & I can make anything more of this.

Lately I take walks with friends where we reveal that we want to live in each other’s worlds — getting to know one another, what makes us tick, to the stage where we openly share what we once internally thought to be absurd and impossible. Processes of exchange, infallibly the best means to immediately nurture something that outlives both of us. The extension of my world to theirs, to their means of living & understanding then shaping the way I would like to live in all of mine. Dare I say that life feels holiest when we all don’t just play god — we realize we all are one.

  • Fictions. I have long lived with friends where we have always been, continuously, shaping the world we want to live in after seeing that the one we were posited in was not right for us; I have always been fascinated by ideas and visions of fantasy. Often our imaginaries were shaped by fiction; it took years to figure out how we could extract something from these stories and feelings that we hoped to feel one day. Specifically, design is fantasy — fantasy is a realm of adjacency, and adjacencies are the most human way of understanding one another. We wrote stories and played games that seemed to set us on deeper dystopias that despite, afforded an optimism and way out. It’s easy to get yourself immersed in an outside world if you don’t believe that it can be brought back to your own: this sense of practicality, this sense of the world borrowing what I love most from the unreal — was what a good fraction of my teenhood grappled with. I was immensely in love with a vision that someone else set, and then grew up when I realized that I could make it my own.
  • Faith in novelty. I, lately, seek ‘newness’ and what is subjectively novel to myself to understand the densities of different worlds and the ways to walk blindly in new directions. My relationship with faith has still been soured by religion as one of constraints & ostracization rather than the generous optimism & belief in manifesting emergence — I’m still teaching myself about the ideal way to practice it and that the most potent, meaningful form of spirituality and what all the prayers must truly have been about was drawing inwards and finding interconnectedness and a promise of something greater. How am I to believe in purpose if I have no faith in how ambiguous of a journey it might be? Meaning making prerequisites faith. In myself, in the values that lead me to deeply interrogate, in the world ahead.

  • Moral alignment. Being a ‘creator’ is important because it speaks so critically to one’s inner values: their philosophy to what is needed to what was been missing, to selfish cravings of what would be delightful to live alongside in addition to what sustains and nurtures, to what they value in their internal worlds and how they carry values from external ones, to their own gauge of their capacities to shape something. I struggle most when interfacing with other people if I don’t understand what they’re living for or the principles they abide; everyone lives for something even if they can’t name it. Otherwise we wouldn’t be here. It’s easy to disappear but far easier to live.

  • The act of creation is not a weapon; the object of survival must assume the shape of a container, in us shaping the vessels for other people to stay in.

    DON JUAN: …My brain is the organ by which nature strives to understand itself. …
    DEVIL: What is the use of knowing?
    DON JUAN: …To be able to choose the line of greatest advantage instead of yielding in the direction of least resistance. Does a ship sail to its destination no better than a log drifts nowhither? …And there you have our difference: To be in Hell is to drift: to be in Heaven is to steer.
  • Artifacts as repetition. When I write or think, I am drawn to how other people viscerally describe the world we both feel: it is in the way someone else has declared love that I myself learned to love.

    What more could stories be than artifacts of what we had felt? Why do I tell and seek to be understood by some other instead of just speaking it to the wall; why do I trust the internet as a safehold for my emotions that might someday reach someone? In Borges’ The Aleph, so beautifully masturbatory in describing so holy the most mundane to the most glorious of all of natural and human sights in this universe, there is endless amounts of repetition. “I saw the teeming sea; I saw daybreak and nightfall; I saw the multitudes of America; I saw a silvery cobweb in the center of a black pyramid; I saw a splintered labyrinth (it was London); I saw, close up, unending eyes watching themselves in me as in a mirror; I saw all the mirrors on earth and none of them reflected me; I saw in a backyard of Soler Street the same tiles that thirty years before I’d seen in the entrance of a house in Fray Bentos; I saw bunches of grapes, snow, tobacco, lodes of metal, steam; I saw convex equatorial deserts and each one of their grains of sand; I saw a woman in Inverness whom I shall never forget.” Creation I read: “Besides, if the language cannot describe nor comprehend the Aleph, human memory cannot retain it as well.”

  • I can’t fully exclude myself from the commodification of ‘making’, but this is my excuse for why I feel so frustrated and restless when I can’t make. Say, a few weeks ago I hit my head on the wall (on purpose) and it’s been fucking with my head ever since and I still can’t look into screens without terrible migraines (so I used this as an excuse to buy a half-dozen books over the past week) and the most terrible part was that the pain was so unbearable that I could not bring myself to create. Concussed, I laid in bed and thought about all these ideas and stories and promises and thought that I may have fucked up the most valuable organ in this body —— nothing is being asked of me outside of my day job, which was kindly forgiving to the injury — but I grew angry at how I could not make.

    Making has always been my form of living, to tell everyone the new idea and story and vision I have for what I think must be highlighted and elevated in this world or to what I think the world needs, because making has been my form of saying I love you to everyone around me and when I do not have the artifact I wither because I have always been terrible with words. To not make means that — there are so many new worlds I have been breeding and pouring myself into and would like to discuss but there is no artifact or words or synthesis that I can offer yet.
  • A case for the new world. Restlessness in this world is an understatement — many times this world has been too hostile for myself and the people I love, its systems in abandon or in quiet maintenance to continue exploiting and torturing us for the convenience of a few. I don’t blame every single person who can’t see that the new world is possible, but I do bear spite for those who callously benefit from the world that is intentionally trying to steer what I adore away.

    “I love anyone who creates” is also maybe too generous of a statement; I look at the rationale for leaving this one and what they seek in the next. Not every world is compatible; just as the one I desire to leave, there must be billions more that I fear walking in.
  • Making beyond expression must be an act of revelation. Process is more pertinent and precious than outcome for this very reason. It’s in the process of making that the revelation occurs, because the artifact is just a testament to that — it’s why I cannot be satisfied putting something out into the world without slyly wishing someone could peer into it enough to begin tracing through and wanting the answers to the thousands of questions that ran through my mind while getting there.

    Along with commodification, this is why I feel like I’m (rightfully) cruel and judgmental sometimes when design and art and whatnot are so conflated with their commercial/corporate practices — that there is very rarely, a time when I hear a young person or student now say they want to design because they want to design a world and design possibilities as it is always wanting to design packaging or cover for no reason for it to be seen — there is nothing majestic about the process they imply here and there is only interest in the outcome.

    I want everyday revelations. I don’t know any other practice that affords me so much meaning right when I’m dot-connecting or a bit after; I know I’m stubbornly drawn to what I do because these revelations are gratifying, holy, so powerfully sensible when it comes — and that it always comes with the practice as long as I keep an eye open to it.

But where have we strayed to? We are questioning concerning technology, and we have arrived now at aletheia, at revealing. What has the essence of technology to do with revealing? The answer: everything. For every bringing-forth is grounded in revealing. Bringing-forth, indeed, gathers within itself the four modes of occasioning— causality—and rules them throughout. Within its domain belong end and means as well as instrumentality. Instrumentality is considered to be the fundamental characteristic of technology. If we inquire step by step into what technology, represented as means, actually is, then we shall arrive at revealing. The possibility of all productive manufacturing lies in revealing.
Technology is therefore no mere means. Technology is a way of revealing. If we give heed to this, then another whole realm for the essence of technology will open itself up to us. It is the realm of revealing, i.e., of truth.

The Question Concerning Technology

reader of my blog, i want to talk about blogs

Reading Time: < 1 minute

I want to talk about blogs! I want to make more blogs (including ephemeral, temporary ones) and publish something low-stakes and start a blog ring with everyone who joins in.

This is my corner of the internet — but I would like to learn about yours.

Some things to cover…

  • Why you should blog (do most of you who read this also have your own blogs?)
  • Ways to blog (platforms you can use)
    • (and how to make your blog small, secure, gated, anonymous, etc. in the way you’d like)
    • + starting a commonplace blog with your friends, each as individual authors or sharing one login
  • Making 88×31 buttons and adding each other to a web ring (and what web rings are!)
  • A bit on RSS, if interested
  • Time to make a blog post and silent commenting on each other’s posts

what is keeping you from making a blog. what would you like to learn about blogs? 

alternatively, if you already have a blog you can just use the time to customize your blog or write.. :~)

when should i host it? what should we write about? how would you like to gather?

Smaller and smaller questions

Reading Time: 8 minutes

Obsessing over being a better question asker seems to miss the point of the exercise; the exercise is always in people. Anyone I talk to who relentlessly seeks to find and filter for depth often misses it.

The answer to intensity is often to match around it then go a bit above or beyond. The only reason to cut someone off if their guard is so high or inane and there’s no sight of what is interesting – not because there isn’t something there – but because it’s not worth getting towards. Choosing who is worth diving for is the play at life, anyway. All I am is looking for a pool I’d like to swim in. All I am is choosing between murkier and clearer waters, where I can see the rewards in sight yet am always pleasantly surprised. People might just be pools. The feeling of drowning in the ocean is the closest I’ve ever gotten to replicating the feeling of truly knowing someone; if we write song and poem to capture the noise of falling in love then submergence is the equivalent of human complexity. Outside of my own head I forget that I am just one ripple of the water; but the human experience is cavernous and overlapping, sometimes I’m so stuck on finding people who have felt the same things as me, stuck on those who have grown up with the same traumas & stories, needing a sense of grounding familiarity because I don’t know what else is worth wading for.

Living in America has exposed me to so much diversity of background that depth-diving becomes a more relevant topic. I’m a person of storied history and every interaction is an attempt at finding what has come to bring us to this moment; how we can understand this moment together. That is: I’m afraid that everyone I meet today has far little time to know me than kids on holiday a decade ago, where life was simple and we couldn’t talk about much but the shape of the sky. Now I can’t just talk about the sky. I need to know where this has all begun. Why you talk the way you do as a consequence of what was unasked, what you did ask, what you had paved in this lifetime.

I like empty pleasantries in the street, but conversations in club bathrooms that lead to free drinks and leads to deeper places are even better, and emails over something that you thought no one else in the world but dead authors wanted to engage you on with mounds of context and open stories at the sleight of a search are even better. Depth-diving holds meaning both offline and offline as the only prerequisite is sustained engagement because the diving never truly happens in one session, where stakes are often determined in the foundation of this meeting and rarely adjusted until someone takes the leap. But there are certain questions that work well and make some better divers than others.

What I talk about when I’m talking about the weather is the foregrounding of all that is coming for the week – so I need you to know a bit more than the universal belief that warmth and sunshine is all it takes, because I like it when the rain pours particularly for the clearing where the benches at the park are wet and it’s empty and I can sit at the craggly rocks and I don’t care that my clothes are wrinkled or that my hair is damp because more than seeing I want to just feel everything. What I talk about when I’m talking about my favorite television show isn’t just interest in the last thing Paul Mescal was in, or a need to talk about the anime in season, or a need to see what the show everyone else is talking about for the sake of talking about it – I can only talk about something that has directly meant something to my life, because nothing is particularly empty so forgive me if this gets a lot deeper than we intended. When I go around in a circle and give off an answer to our favorite food I would rather kill myself because we’re calculating how to come off as quirky enough but not too offputting that we’re trying too hard with the quirk and that someone can come up to us with the answer after, and what I want to really tell you is a mundane answer like steak because I’ve cooked it a hundred times at this point and my family and I used to split a steak every Wednesday where they would douse it in soy sauce in a particular way and it is one of the only meals where I could ever truly feel the love in the house and I used to have it well-done all the time, even at the restaurant against the pressing of the server, because my public hospital worker parents in their underfunded institutions have only gotten out of it a fear of the reds in their food and so much exhaustion that they only know how to say I love you and nothing else. And also because I was on Reddit way too much as a teenager and had the humor of a white American boy with no understanding of what I was saying, and definitely had better grammar then when I was correcting other American boys but have now far regressed. I can’t tell you all this in a circle and go wind down those other paths. I can’t be that Asian talking about food again because you want to hear the easy story about tears and peeled fruit but in my house it was well-done steak doused in a mix of A1 Steak Sauce, Lea & Perrins Worcestershire Sauce, and a regular bottle of Kikkoman for the steak with no garlic yet pooled enough juices to make the rice go black.

I’m only interested in the weather and the empty television and the show you put on blankly and your dog that looks like a hotdog once I know all of you. I love small talk because it never really is small. But I want to know more than how fucking ugly your dog looks after its last haircut because I honestly don’t give a shit about its picture and when I call it ugly I genuinely mean it – but I do want to see who you call when you’re on vacation and need someone to watch the stupid hotdog dog, the way you talk to it (and if it’s better or hopefully worse than the way you talk to other people), the way you love it as a signal for how you love yourself too. I want to know that the weather is one part and that your teeth are too sensitive to sip any cup with ice in it so you need a straw and even drink iced water with a straw at home. I want to tell you that I don’t care for the format of television but I did have four exhausted pencils scotch taped together to switch the channels or raise the volume on the box TV we had at home, and that the first sign of non-normalcy I found was in the way I determined what show should be on by channel number in relation to time of day and constructed a specific formula and TV watching guide for others in the household.

Empty questions suddenly mean everything once I know you, but I can’t use them to get to know you.

Forgive me if the first few questions are frightening, and forgive me if the task of ‘reading each other’ is fun even when I acknowledge its impossibility. There’s too much novelty in me, I self-confess, and my deepest fear is the ocean not just because we don’t know what’s in it but because I think it’s the easiest body that I am drawn to and have walked into far too much and I was surrounded by ocean growing up but lived in urban Manila where walking to the coast was a luxury comparable to owning a bathtub and shampooing your hair without sachet packets. And then I can tell you the drowning stories. And then I can tell you, right after the taste of saltwater, that at this point everyone (in our world) knows that the blobfish thing is no longer funny but incredibly tragic as it is a creature only known by its appearance in an extremely deformed, imploded state and that normally it just looks like any other stupid fish. And right after that I can tell you that I’ve researched the body in various states of decay after entering the water, and you can tell other people this because a friend who was writing a novel and wanted to know knew it, and I can tell someone else that this is all because I wanted to know what would happen to my body.

Where do I walk to find people who aren’t afraid of the ocean these days? If it’s the most common and cliche fear, like heights – but we all fawn over the sport of diving though don’t really seem to understand it, and in our heads dives have more turns and tumbles than they actually do a precise cut into the water. Someone one day needs to tell me what the body is like when it slices water in two, or the game you played of Moses and God in the shallow part of the swimming pool, or when you dove into the water to try and push your sister up and up after she started drowning and everyone got to pull her up and ended up nearly drowning you too.

The theory lately is that so much starts with proximity: after school campuses you’re left with your colleagues and friends of friends. Continued exposure means that the shallowness evolves into something else, but we can’t expect too much of each other too fast. But I don’t particularly know the stakes of being truthful about the days and how I don’t really care about the weather with you yet, but I can talk to you about something deeper. I don’t mind you knowing how I felt about the water when my best friends still don’t and we’re never seeing each other again. I don’t think people knowing has a set progression, of course, but I mean this more erratically – like I love it when someone knows the darkest parts before my name, and another only the name for the past 22 years of my life. Depth-diving is a human activity, so we lead each other into the water and collectively decide our own pace. I hold your hand and bring you down; I can’t do this for a crowd, not in the circles where we’re telling each other how we got into something or how we believed in something, because we’re all too busy holding our breaths and not diverging. We need to walk at the bottom of the sea. I need to see how you’re seeing.

There’s nothing I can offer about being a better question asker except that it’s fun to interrogate everything. The answer to the question matters less than how you choose to answer it — whether we’re still performing to one another, how much we’re letting go, waiting because this isn’t an interview and that when you love someone and the energy is high and we’re there until 4AM or god forbid — deep at 4PM while walking to the train station too — question asking stops being a game of who is more clever and if we get each other’s references and what we want to know about each other and all becomes an excuse to just know each other. This is what I love. If we can talk about the weather and what the sky looks like I will tell you my thoughts on clouds and my book on clouds and everything remotely relevant, and when you say they spelled the name on your iced latte wrong I will ask you if you feel like you yourself were named wrong. Or what your thoughts are on naming things yourself. Or what the last thing you named was. I hope I continue to meet people whom I ask about the weekend who instead offer the story of their life. I hope it’s fine when you ask me my go-to coffee order and I tell you why I lie. I hope I offer everything I love with the same reverence in comprehension; I hope I stick with people who love asking questions, empty or not, until we get to the nice part of the water where everything is temperate and still are able to confess that we both much rather prefer it when we’re deathly freezing.

Let me begin by asking you how the water feels.